Richtlijn: Opsporen oogafwijkingen (2019)

Referenties

  • Adhikari, S. and U. Shrestha, Validation of performance of certified medical assistants in preschool vision screening examination. Nepalese journal of ophthalmology : a biannual peer-reviewed academic journal of the Nepal Ophthalmic Society : NEPJOPH, 2011. 3(2): p. 128-33.
  • Awan, M., et al., An audit of the outcome of amblyopia treatment: a retrospective analysis of 322 children. The British journal of ophthalmology, 2010. 94(8): p. 1007-11.
  • Beck, R.W., The course of moderate amblyopia treated with atropine in children: Experience of the amblyopia treatment study. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2003. 136(4): p. 630-639.
  • Becker R, et al. Examination of young children with LEA symbols. Br J Ophthalmol 2002. 86:513-16.
  • Bertuzzi, F., et al., Sensitivity and specificity of a visual acuity screening protocol performed with the Lea Symbols 15-line folding distance chart in preschool children. Acta Ophthalmol Scand, 2006. 84(6): p. 807-811.
  • Bušić, M., et al., Zagreb Amblyopia Preschool Screening Study: Near and distance visual acuity testing increase the diagnostic accuracy of screening for amblyopia. Croatian Medical Journal, 2016. 57(1): p. 29-41.
  • Carlton, J., et al., The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening programmes for amblyopia and strabismus in children up to the age of 4-5 years: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2008. 12(25): p. iii-194.
  • Chen, P.L., et al., Anisometropic Amblyopia Treated with Spectacle Correction Alone: Possible Factors Predicting Success and Time to Start Patching. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 2007. 143(1): p. 54-60.
  • Chou, R., T. Dana, and C. Bougatsos, Screening for visual impairment in children ages 1-5 years: update for the USPSTF. Pediatrics, 2011. 127(2): p. e442-79.
  • Clarke, M. P., Wright, C. M., Hrisos, S., Anderson, J. D., Henderson, J., & Richardson, S. R. (2003). Randomised controlled trial of treatment of unilateral visual impairment detected at preschool vision screening. Bmj, 327(7426), 1251.
  • Eibschitz-Tsimhoni, M., et al., Early screening for amblyogenic risk factors lowers the prevalence and severity of amblyopia. Journal of AAPOS, 2000. 4(4): p. 194-199.
  • Engin, O., Despriet, D. D., van der Meulen-Schot, H. M., Romers, A., Slot, X., Sang, M. T.,  Simonsz, H. J. (2014). Comparison of optotypes of Amsterdam Picture Chart with those of Tumbling-E, LEA symbols, ETDRS, and Landolt-C in non-amblyopic and amblyopic patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 252(12), 2013-2020.
  • Flynn, J.T., et al., The therapy of amblyopia: an analysis comparing the results of amblyopia therapy utilizing two pooled data sets. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, 1999. 97: p. 373-5.
  • Friendly, D.S., Preschool visual acuity screening tests. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society, 1978. 76: p. 383-480.
  • Hussein, M.A.W., et al., Risk factors for treatment failure of anisometropic amblyopia. Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus / American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2004. 8(5): p. 429-34.
  • IqwiG Screening for visual impairment in children younger than 6 years: rapid report (Structured abstract). Health Technology Assessment Database, 2015.
  • Kvarnström G, Jakobsson P (2005) Is vision screening in 3-year-old children feasible?
  • Comparison between the Lea Symbol chart and the HVOT (LM) chart. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 83:76-80.
  • Lai, Y.-H., et al., Uncorrected visual acuity and noncycloplegic autorefraction predict significant refractive errors in Taiwanese preschool children. Ophthalmology, 2013. 120(2): p. 271-6.
  • Lithander, J. and J. Sjostrand, Anisometropic and strabismic amblyopia in the age group 2 years and above: a prospective study of the results of treatment. The British journal of ophthalmology, 1991. 75(2): p. 111-6.
  • Lokesh, H. and M. Bindurani, Management of amblyopia by occlusion therapy. Research Journal of Pharmaceutical, Biological and Chemical Sciences, 2015. 6(4): p. 972-6.
  • Mathers, M., M. Keyes, and M. Wright, A review of the evidence on the effectiveness of children's vision screening. Child: care, health and development, 2010. 36(6): p. 756-80.
  • Mazow, M.L., et al., 1999 Costenbader Lecture. Outcome study in amblyopia: treatment and practice pattern variations. Journal of AAPOS : the official publication of the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus / American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, 2000. 4(1): p. 1-9.
  • NVvO NOG OVN Plan geïntegreerde oogzorg. (2013)
  • Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion, Effectiveness of vision screening programs for children aged one to six years. 2016, ON: Queen's Printer for Ontario: Toronto.
  • Ore, L., et al., Performance measures of the illiterate E-chart vision-screening test used in Northern District Israeli school children. Journal of medical screening, 2008. 15(2): p. 65-71.
  • Ore, L., et al., Vision screening among northern Israeli Jewish and Arab schoolchildren. The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ, 2009. 11(3): p. 160-5.
  • Powell, C. and S.R. Hatt, Vision screening for amblyopia in childhood. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2009(3): p. CD005020.
  • Powell, C., S. Wedner, and R. Hatt Sarah Vision screening for correctable visual acuity deficits in school-age children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2004.  DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD005023.pub2.
  • Schmucker, C., et al., Effectiveness of early in comparison to late(r) treatment in children with amblyopia or its risk factors: a systematic review. Ophthalmic epidemiology, 2010. 17(1): p. 7-17.
  • Schmucker, C., et al., Effectiveness of screening preschool children for amblyopia: a systematic review. BMC ophthalmology, 2009. 9: p. 3.
  • Stewart, C.E., et al., Treatment of unilateral amblyopia: factors influencing visual outcome. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2005. 46(9): p. 3152-60.
  • Telleman MAJ, Sloot F, Benjamins J, Simonsz HJ. High rate of failed visual-acuity measurements with the Amsterdam Picture Chart in screening at the age of 36 months. Acta Ophthalmol. 2019: 97:24-28.
  • Tjiam AM, Groenewoud JH, Passchier J, Loudon SE, de Graaf, Hoogeveen C, Lantau VK, Juttmann RE, de Koning HJ, Simonsz HJ (2011) Determinants and outcome of unsuccessful referral after positive screening in a large birth-cohort study of population-based vision screening. J AAPOS 15:256-262.
  • Wallace, D., et al., Time course and predictors of amblyopia improvement with 2 hours of daily patching. JAMA Ophthalmology, 2015. 133(5): p. 606-9.
  • West, S. and C. Williams, Amblyopia. BMJ clinical evidence, 2011. 2011.
  • Williams, C., et al., Amblyopia treatment outcomes after preschool screening v school entry screening: Observational data from a prospective cohort study. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 2003. 87(8): p. 988-993.

Pagina als PDF